ext_12592 ([identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lydy 2003-09-10 06:09 am (UTC)

However, a photograph of someone veiled is not actually ID. Maybe they should do something else, like fingerprints, for people who do not want to show their faces, and certainly what happened to her cousin was unacceptable, but a photograph of someone veiled could be a photograph of anyone, and anyone could use a piece of supposed ID with that photograph on.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting