Three Body Problem -- Arghhhh!
Jul. 17th, 2015 11:17 amSo, anybody else really unhappy with this much touted novel? Finished it today, and am so very frustrated. It doesn't go below No Award, but really, I was hoping for so much better.
Will talk to anyone who wants to talk in comments. Spoilers a-ok in comments.
Arghhh.
Will talk to anyone who wants to talk in comments. Spoilers a-ok in comments.
Arghhh.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-17 04:20 pm (UTC)The ending? Oh my gods, I'm annoyed. I haven't been this annoyed at a ending since Atwood's _A Handmaid's Tale_ which I hated for many, many reasons, but the ending brought it all home.
And did I say, "Arghhh"? Oh, I did, didn't I? Well, arghh again.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-17 05:12 pm (UTC)Overall it's neck and neck for me with The Goblin Emperor, another novel I had major problems with. Both well above No Award. Still haven't read Ancillary Sword, but kind of don't want to vote for it anyway because I believe in spreading these things around.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 02:13 am (UTC)Yes, the Cultural Revolution was a monumental catastrophe. And personally, I still can't completely trust the former members of our [i.e., United States] domestic Chairman Mao Fan Club. (I used to know the page numbers of the most mind-bogglingly authoritarian bits in the little red book. From all over the "political spectrum" people work to forget that Mao was a Stalinist.)
Mao conquered China. Even taking it from such a corrupt, useless bunch as the Kuomintang was an epic achievement. It's been done only a handful of times in all history.
I suspect he didn't realize that would be the easy part. Cause then he set about to re-make China. Hundred Flowers, Great Leap, etc. China remains China. The last and most extreme effort was the Cultural Revolution. My hypothesis is that he was just totally FRUSTRATED.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-19 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-17 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-17 04:49 pm (UTC)I agree about the vividness and horror of the real world part about the Cultural Revolution-- fictional dystopias are much less intense.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-17 06:34 pm (UTC)I have my votes in for the Hugos, and it is above No Award - something that isn't true for all of the nominees (I'll admit that resentment over some of the dreck nominees I ended up reading last year very much influenced this year's votes).
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 01:23 am (UTC)In some ways, I found the passages about the Cultural Revolution the most involving -- being historical, they had a more lived-in feel than the rest. The period was certainly bloodier than I realized, but that, as far as I can tell, is true of virtually any period in Chinese history you might want to name. I'm currently reading Autumn In the Heavenly Kingdom, a history of the Taiping Rebellion that integrates the Western and Chinese takes on events, and holy cow, that was huge. The largest civil conflict ever waged on the planet, and if you hear about it in school it's a bare mention as you trundle through the tedium of US 19th C. history.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:48 am (UTC)The various suicides. I kinda skimmed the last 10% of the novel, but I assume they were because the scientists were getting scary irrational results because of the intelligent protons? That seems weird and wrong, too. I mean, one guy whose entire theory of the universe goes up in smoke, sure, but a rash? And I believe some Westerners not just Chinese? How does that even work? Emotionally, I mean.
The two side of the Trisolarian fan club seem to be unrealistically monolithic. There should have been more factions, more complexity. The author is right, the advent of a new intelligent species would be transformative. But people are, I think, far weirder than he is giving them credit for.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 04:49 am (UTC)The middle sagged but I did enjoy the beginning & the end. My main problem with it was that it dropped me out of the narrative too many times to deserve my top spot:
- the scientists suiciding was not believable.
- the monomolecular wire sequence had my eyes rolling
- the etching of circuitry onto a proton I don't believe is theoretically possible.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 04:42 pm (UTC)And yeah, the implausibility of an intelligent species arising on Trisolaris at all, let alone somehow restarting civilization over and over, under conditions when the planetary surface is periodically burned to a cinder, intruded from time to time.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:54 am (UTC)And a niggling annoyance: what the hell is a "Trisolarian hour"? Why hour? Of what is it comprised? How do they measure time, what with their solar system being all chaotic?
Oh, and back to the biology, why do they only have two sexes? Oh, the biology. Arghhh.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 09:11 pm (UTC)(One big difference seems to be that the Chinese version starts with Wang Miao; he goes all the way to meeting Ye Wenjie before the section about her starts. I don't know if this is particular to the Taiwanese edition, or to the original version, or what; it seems like the English version starts with Ye Wenjie, no?)
no subject
Date: 2015-07-24 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 05:39 pm (UTC)Hmm, I wonder why the copy I have starts with Wang Miao? From this page , it looks like the Mainland edition also starts with Wang Miao, implying that the English edition is rearranged. I wonder what the decision was there. I just wrote an email to Ken Liu to inquire -- I'll post more if he responds.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 10:22 pm (UTC)(I am hoping that responding to this takes it out of moderation.)
no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 10:51 pm (UTC).
no subject
Date: 2015-07-28 09:50 am (UTC)I need to look at my LJ settings. Not that I know where to do that, but whatevs.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-27 10:52 pm (UTC)